<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Chinese Nikon D400	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.ylovephoto.com/en/2009/02/08/chinese-nikon-d400/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.ylovephoto.com/en/2009/02/08/chinese-nikon-d400/</link>
	<description>Intrigued by photography</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2011 18:25:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Yves Roumazeilles		</title>
		<link>https://www.ylovephoto.com/en/2009/02/08/chinese-nikon-d400/#comment-5099</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yves Roumazeilles]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2011 18:25:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ylovephoto.com/en/?p=1494#comment-5099</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Mark, what you describe has a very very low probability.

The D300s (DX) needs a replacement for sure. It would be the &lt;b&gt;Nikon D400&lt;/b&gt;. But dual CF is less and less probable seeing how the market is moving toward SD cards. A dual SD+CF solution would be much much more adequate for Nikon.

Now, this being done, Nikon still needs to decide what to do after the D700 (FX model, but not a flagship yet) and there is clearly some space for a &lt;a href=&quot;https://ylovephoto.com/en/cat/slr/nikon/nikon-d800/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;D800&lt;/a&gt;. Apparently, it would be using a much higher resolution sensor (thanks to Sony&#039;s effort to reduce pixel-cell size and Nikon&#039;s legendary noise management algorithms).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark, what you describe has a very very low probability.</p>
<p>The D300s (DX) needs a replacement for sure. It would be the <b>Nikon D400</b>. But dual CF is less and less probable seeing how the market is moving toward SD cards. A dual SD+CF solution would be much much more adequate for Nikon.</p>
<p>Now, this being done, Nikon still needs to decide what to do after the D700 (FX model, but not a flagship yet) and there is clearly some space for a <a href="https://ylovephoto.com/en/cat/slr/nikon/nikon-d800/" rel="nofollow">D800</a>. Apparently, it would be using a much higher resolution sensor (thanks to Sony&#8217;s effort to reduce pixel-cell size and Nikon&#8217;s legendary noise management algorithms).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mark		</title>
		<link>https://www.ylovephoto.com/en/2009/02/08/chinese-nikon-d400/#comment-5095</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2011 05:36:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ylovephoto.com/en/?p=1494#comment-5095</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The flagship DX model should have dual CF slots like its FX counterparts.

They don&#039;t need another FX model ... they do however, need to upgrade the DX flagship.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The flagship DX model should have dual CF slots like its FX counterparts.</p>
<p>They don&#8217;t need another FX model &#8230; they do however, need to upgrade the DX flagship.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Yves Roumazeilles		</title>
		<link>https://www.ylovephoto.com/en/2009/02/08/chinese-nikon-d400/#comment-102</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yves Roumazeilles]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 17:24:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ylovephoto.com/en/?p=1494#comment-102</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Obviously, everybody will notice that nothing is said about the sensor size/format. But, seeing 24 MP and a reuse of the Nikon D700 body, I&#039;d think this is going to be the low-cost Full Frame many people were expecting.

What do you think?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obviously, everybody will notice that nothing is said about the sensor size/format. But, seeing 24 MP and a reuse of the Nikon D700 body, I&#8217;d think this is going to be the low-cost Full Frame many people were expecting.</p>
<p>What do you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
