<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Best Nikon SLR lenses for wildlife photo	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.ylovephoto.com/en/2010/12/28/best-nikon-slr-lenses-for-wildlife-photo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.ylovephoto.com/en/2010/12/28/best-nikon-slr-lenses-for-wildlife-photo/</link>
	<description>Intrigued by photography</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2011 04:49:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Yves Roumazeilles		</title>
		<link>https://www.ylovephoto.com/en/2010/12/28/best-nikon-slr-lenses-for-wildlife-photo/#comment-5133</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yves Roumazeilles]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2011 04:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ylovephoto.com/en/?p=8856#comment-5133</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The 200-400mm zoom lens seems to have quite mixed reviews and some people will argue that its quality is degraded when shooting at long distance (whatever the focal length) or at distances longer than the usual test/review distance.

It stays quite attractive, but checking the lens you want to buy may be needed.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 200-400mm zoom lens seems to have quite mixed reviews and some people will argue that its quality is degraded when shooting at long distance (whatever the focal length) or at distances longer than the usual test/review distance.</p>
<p>It stays quite attractive, but checking the lens you want to buy may be needed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
