<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>DxOMark &#8211; YLovePhoto</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.ylovephoto.com/en/tag/dxomark/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.ylovephoto.com/en</link>
	<description>Intrigued by photography</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 20:26:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>DxOMark: Now with Nikon D7000</title>
		<link>https://www.ylovephoto.com/en/2010/11/08/dxomark-now-with-nikon-d7000/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yves Roumazeilles]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 20:19:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Nikon D7000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DxOMark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sensor]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ylovephoto.com/en/?p=8540</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[At DxO Labs, there is one hell of a director of special effects. One after the other, there are news exploding in front of observers. First, there was a Sony Alpha 55 marginally better than the other cameras, then a Pentax K-5 which jumped ahead everybody else with 82 points. Here comes the Nikon D7000 [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://ylovephoto.com/fr/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/dxomark_d7000_by_date.jpg"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" src="https://ylovephoto.com/fr/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/dxomark_d7000_by_date-300x229.jpg" alt="" title="dxomark_d7000_by_date" width="300" height="229" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-8482" /></a>At DxO Labs, there is one hell of a director of special effects. One after the other, there are news exploding in front of observers. First, there was a Sony Alpha 55 marginally better than the other cameras, then a <a href="/en/slr/pentax/pentax-k-5/">Pentax K-5</a> which jumped ahead everybody else with 82 points. Here comes the <a href="/en/slr/nikon/nikon-d7000">Nikon D7000</a> with a nearly equally impressive ranking (80 points).</p>
<p>It takes the second rank among the APS-C digital sensors for DSLR photo cameras. But its price is 300-400€ below a Pentax K-5. Nice price-performance ratio.</p>
<p>Just a reminder: Above 80, the DxOMark sensor rankings are normally attributed only to very high-end cameras most of them using a Full Frame sensor&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="https://ylovephoto.com/en/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/dxomark_d7000_by_price.jpg"><img decoding="async" src="https://ylovephoto.com/en/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/dxomark_d7000_by_price-600x471.jpg" alt="" title="dxomark_d7000_by_price" width="600" height="471" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-8543" srcset="https://www.ylovephoto.com/en/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/dxomark_d7000_by_price-600x471.jpg 600w, https://www.ylovephoto.com/en/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/dxomark_d7000_by_price-300x235.jpg 300w, https://www.ylovephoto.com/en/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/dxomark_d7000_by_price-480x376.jpg 480w, https://www.ylovephoto.com/en/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/dxomark_d7000_by_price-235x184.jpg 235w, https://www.ylovephoto.com/en/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/dxomark_d7000_by_price-75x58.jpg 75w, https://www.ylovephoto.com/en/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/dxomark_d7000_by_price-350x274.jpg 350w, https://www.ylovephoto.com/en/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/dxomark_d7000_by_price-220x172.jpg 220w, https://www.ylovephoto.com/en/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/dxomark_d7000_by_price-150x117.jpg 150w, https://www.ylovephoto.com/en/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/dxomark_d7000_by_price.jpg 754w" sizes="(max-width: 600px) 100vw, 600px" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
