<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>web &#8211; YLovePhoto</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.ylovephoto.com/en/tag/web/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.ylovephoto.com/en</link>
	<description>Intrigued by photography</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 18:44:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>DSLR comparisons</title>
		<link>https://www.ylovephoto.com/en/2010/05/09/dslr-comparisons/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yves Roumazeilles]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 May 2010 12:33:24 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Buy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SLR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ylovephoto.com/en/?p=5512</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It is often a little difficult to compare two cameras feature by feature. I&#8217;ve come to a web site which does that (and only that), but does it nicely: SnapSort.com. Nice.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://ylovephoto.com/en/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/comparison.png"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" src="https://ylovephoto.com/en/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/comparison-300x245.png" alt="" title="" width="300" height="245" class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-5513" srcset="https://www.ylovephoto.com/en/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/comparison-300x245.png 300w, https://www.ylovephoto.com/en/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/comparison.png 802w" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" /></a></p>
<p>It is often a little difficult to compare two cameras feature by feature. I&#8217;ve come to a web site which does that (and only that), but does it nicely: <a href="http://snapsort.com/">SnapSort.com</a>.</p>
<p>Nice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Three cheap image hosting services</title>
		<link>https://www.ylovephoto.com/en/2010/04/28/three-cheap-image-hosting-services/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yves Roumazeilles]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 21:14:39 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Image storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flickr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photobucket]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Picasa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ylovephoto.com/en/?p=5586</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Ars Technica has a nice little post comparing three image online hosting and sharing options: Flickr Picasa Photobucket They do not conclude which one is better, merely provide a view about the differences. Good reading.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://arstechnica.com/web/news/2010/03/image-hosting-is-the-kind.ars">Ars Technica</a> has a nice little post comparing three image online hosting and sharing options:</p>
<ul>
<li>Flickr</li>
<li>Picasa</li>
<li>Photobucket</li>
</ul>
<p>They do not conclude which one is better, merely provide a view about the differences.</p>
<p>Good reading.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
